TOGETHER, WE HAVE THE POWER TO EFFECT POSITIVE CHANGE LET'S TEAM UP
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Banner

The Future of DEI Post-Freedom Fund

Chris Sanders Law PLLC Feb. 27, 2025

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs aim to address systemic inequities, promote diversity in the workplace, and create fairer environments for everyone. However, DEI programs have recently faced significant challenges.  

With shifting political landscapes, economic pressures, and organizational restructuring, the progress of these initiatives has often stalled. Some companies struggle to maintain consistent funding for DEI programs, while others face criticism or skepticism about their effectiveness.  

Additionally, pushback against DEI efforts has grown in certain sectors, making it harder to implement meaningful change. Despite these hurdles, the need for robust and impactful DEI strategies remains more critical than ever. 

The closure of the Freedom Fund—a critical financial resource supporting DEI initiatives, particularly for Black women—raises complicated legal and operational questions for both employers and nonprofit organizations. 

Here, as an experienced attorney at Chris Sanders Law PLLC in Louisville, Kentucky, I'll walk through the future of DEI efforts and explore how organizations can continue to address diversity, equity, and inclusion despite legislative and judicial changes. 

What Did the Freedom Fund Do? 

The Freedom Fund was created to support diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, especially targeting historically marginalized groups.

For nonprofit organizations, public institutions, and private employers, the fund provided financial resources to implement DEI policies, fund training programs, and promote inclusive practices, particularly for Black women.  

Through this funding, nonprofits were able to fulfill their mission to provide services to underserved communities, and employers could implement best practices for hiring, retention, and promotion. For nonprofits and employers alike, it provided the following benefits: 

  • For nonprofits: The Freedom Fund represented an important resource for qualifying organizations seeking to comply with both federal and state laws designed to reduce inequality in the workplace.  

  • For employers: The fund enabled employers to develop inclusive workplace cultures and ensure compliance with non-discrimination requirements under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other relevant federal and state regulations.  

However, the dissolution of the Freedom Fund has created uncertainty for both employers and nonprofit organizations in Kentucky.

An attorney with experience in the nonprofit sector can provide valuable guidance on how to adapt to the changes and their impacts, verifying compliance with state and federal laws while protecting your organization’s interests. 

DEI Challenges Amid the Fearless Fund Litigation 

The closure of the Freedom Fund and the broader implications of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) litigation, such as the high-profile case against the Fearless Fund, underscore pivotal challenges for organizations dedicated to fostering equity.  

The Fearless Fund litigation, which centers around allegations of racial bias in funding directed at Black women entrepreneurs, has sent shockwaves through the nonprofit and business communities alike by raising critical questions about the legal boundaries of equity-driven initiatives.  

This case raises important questions about what is permissible under anti-discrimination laws and highlights the legal scrutiny that DEI initiatives may face in the current climate.

As anti-discrimination laws come under closer scrutiny, organizations committed to fostering equity must adapt to an evolving legal climate. 

Legal and Community Impact 

The ripple effects of the case extend far beyond the courtroom and the specific organizations involved.

Nonprofits that rely on targeted programming to uplift historically marginalized groups are now rethinking their strategies to ensure they remain compliant with evolving legal standards while staying true to their missions.  

The Fearless Fund litigation is a reminder that nonprofits operating in Kentucky and beyond must be agile and resilient in the face of shifting interpretations of equity and inclusion.

It and similar cases illuminate the growing tension between targeted equity programs and legal definitions of fairness, leaving nonprofits grappling with how to stay compliant while pursuing their missions.  

For nonprofits, this means a renewed focus on designing inclusive programs and engaging diverse communities in ways that align with state and federal laws.

Organizations may find themselves exploring creative solutions, such as broadening their outreach efforts, refining their messaging, and bolstering partnerships to achieve their goals within the bounds of the law.  

The need for sustainable, community-driven approaches has never been greater, especially as legal uncertainties cast a cloud over traditional DEI strategies.

Consider reaching out to me, Attorney Chris Sanders, for a professional opinion on how to best structure your programs to align with both legal standards and best practices.  

As an experienced attorney well-versed in the nonprofit sector, I can guide you through the legal aspects, helping you avoid potential risks and striving to make sure that your company fosters an inclusive environment while remaining compliant with the laws. 

The Future of DEI in Kentucky 

While private employers aren't bound by state restrictions in the same way that public employers are, they may find themselves under increased scrutiny from political actors or community groups who may view DEI initiatives as divisive or unnecessary.  

As Kentucky moves forward in the post-Freedom Fund era, both employers and nonprofits may need to reassess how they approach DEI. Despite the legislative and financial challenges, there remain several viable paths forward: 

  • Private funding and corporate responsibility: Private employers and nonprofit organizations may increasingly rely on private funding, corporate partnerships, and individual donors to continue supporting DEI efforts. This shift toward self-sufficiency may lead to a more decentralized approach to DEI programs, with organizations seeking diverse funding streams rather than relying on government sources. 

  • Focusing on broader initiatives: This includes preventing harassment and working to improve employee retention. It also may involve developing leadership pipelines for underrepresented groups. Companies can also sponsor training and workshops that promote inclusivity in the workplace. 

  • Advocacy and litigation: In response to legal restrictions, DEI advocates may seek to challenge some of Kentucky’s restrictive laws through litigation, particularly those that limit DEI programs in public institutions. Nonprofits may also step up their advocacy efforts to push for legislative changes that make sure that DEI remains a priority for the state. Legal challenges could lead to shifts in policy, especially if courts find that the state’s restrictions conflict with federal mandates. 

  • Increased focus on internal initiatives: For employers, the future of DEI in Kentucky may involve an increased focus on internal initiatives and the cultivation of inclusive workplace cultures without relying on external funding. Employers may need to invest in tailored training, mentorship programs, and community-building efforts that emphasize diversity, equity, and inclusion, all while remaining compliant with local and federal employment laws. 

The future of DEI in Kentucky may face challenges in the wake of the Freedom Fund's closure, but both employers and nonprofit organizations can adapt by focusing on sustainable, legally compliant approaches. 

Supporting Nonprofits Through Legal Advocacy and Strategy 

I have long been a trusted partner for Kentucky nonprofits, helping them overcome operational and legal barriers to advance their goals. In today’s uncertain regulatory climate, my guidance is more critical than ever.

The Fearless Fund litigation is a wake-up call for nonprofits to refine their strategies and remain resilient in the face of increasing legal challenges. 

With the fallout from cases like the Fearless Fund serving as cautionary tales, nonprofits need guidance to comply with regulatory requirements and to continue their social justice work unimpeded.  

From governance practices and grant compliance to advocacy strategies, I provide the support nonprofits need to stay on mission. By fostering collaboration between organizations, I also empower nonprofits to build stronger networks to learn from one another and achieve shared goals. 

For nonprofits committed to equity and inclusion, facing these challenges requires both clarity and foresight. I work diligently to help nonprofits thrive, even amidst adversity, by helping them craft strategies that balance compliance with impact. 

Contact Chris Sanders Law PLLC 

If your nonprofit organization is facing legal challenges or needs guidance in the wake of the Fearless Fund litigation and similar cases, reach out to me at Chris Sanders Law PLLC today.

Supporting nonprofits across Louisville and the greater Kentucky area, I am dedicated to helping your organization pursue its mission confidently and compliantly. Schedule a consultation today to take the next step toward sustainable advocacy and equity-focused impact.